🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

European Movement

In Europe, a rising chorus of states are exploring similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that smartphones and apps are "robbing our kids' youth". A law could be passed soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to approve a proposal raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised families to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic motion supporting a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is granted. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a solid foundation," said one MEP supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Last year, interest gathered behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization established by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after being exposed to dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are safe and fit for minors," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures mandating parental consent for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some individuals to follow this path, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of Europe and the US, further nations are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, global bodies adopt a more measured stance. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

Even as this international debate evolves, the steps of Australia and its followers show that states globally are no longer willing to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.